I am now a journalist- collective intelligence online

As Jordan Greenhall states, the “technological breakthroughs achieved in the last 6 years are finally allowing for large groups of individuals to connect directly, make decisions, collaborate and share value amongst themselves.” This advance is placing a competitive advantage on online content as the pressure of legacy media publishing perfected content without the chance of further editing is affecting their business model and labelling this media form as a “dying industry”. While benefiting from the fast, affordable, flexible and limitless features of online content platforms, people are able to collaborate in order to post the most accurate and useful information, adding their own expertise and opinions in order to continuously improve content.

giphy

I made this gif to present Wikipedia as one of the most prominent examples of this collective intelligence in action. Being a free online encyclopedia with over 30 million users, it is often viewed as an unreliable source of information due to how easily articles can be edited. But shouldn’t this be a reason why we should trust this source?  With people applying their own knowledge, interests and expertise to topics they are interested in and posting this information attached to an abundance of references, Wikipedia has become a place where we can quickly access information about anything, along with a collection of references for further exploration, edited by a collection of passionate experts.

2 thoughts on “I am now a journalist- collective intelligence online

  1. I really enjoy how you used Wikipedia as the main focus as user led content creation and essentially just a community project. When I think of a group of individuals contributing to content creation I automatically think of gaming but I like the fact that the whole basis of Wikipedia is literally based upon communal building and fact checking.

    Like

  2. This is great because on my blog post I also used Wikipedia as an example of collective intelligence, more specifically how it is a website that promotes user engagement as opposed to traditional informational products (CD, newspaper). I think you should give a read from the great Henry Jenkins himself interviewing and talking about Wikipedia (for the first part) and how knowledge in an open and digital world should be http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2008/05/from_production_to_produsage_i.html . While I agree that Wikipedia is a great source as it is created by the people for the people, but, for the very same reason, it can risk spreading false information.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s